EDITORIAL | Sunlight Is Ending the Politics of Personal Destruction

Politics has never been a gentleman's game.

Long before cable news, social media, or campaign consultants, political disagreements had a way of becoming deeply personal. Sometimes they became violent. Alexander Hamilton paid for political rivalry with his life in a duel against Aaron Burr. Senator Charles Sumner was nearly beaten to death on the floor of the United States Senate simply for giving a speech that offended another member of Congress. American politics has always had a dark side.

Thankfully, we've moved beyond settling political disagreements with pistols and canes.

But for decades, another form of political violence survived, one that didn't leave bruises but often left reputations in ruins.

If you've spent any amount of time around politics, especially local politics, you've probably seen it.

Someone questions the people in charge and suddenly support begins to evaporate. Endorsements disappear. Friends stop returning phone calls. Anonymous complaints begin circulating. Rumors find their way into the community. Campaign contributions dry up. People who privately agree with you suddenly become very quiet in public.

Nobody has to say the rules out loud because everyone already knows them.

Stay in line.

Support the approved candidates.

Don't embarrass the people who hold the power.

That wasn't just true in Washington. It happened in county commissions, school boards, political parties, chambers of commerce, civic organizations, and local elections all over America.

As a conservative, I've watched this play out for years. Democrats have certainly gone after Republicans with everything they've had. That's politics. But what surprised me far more was watching Republicans attack other Republicans, not over principles, but over pecking order. Independent thinking wasn't always welcomed. In many circles, loyalty to the political machine mattered more than loyalty to conservative principles.

Power was maintained the old-fashioned way. If persuasion didn't work, intimidation often would.

The remarkable thing is that this system depended almost entirely on secrecy.

Most voters never saw it.

Most citizens had no idea it was happening.

Today, that world is disappearing.

The Internet changed everything.

What once happened behind closed doors now gets recorded on a cell phone. Public records are easier than ever to obtain. Meetings are livestreamed. Citizens compare notes in Facebook groups. Independent media reaches audiences that once belonged exclusively to newspapers and television stations. A local publication like Tidings Media can reach readers across ten Florida counties without asking anyone's permission.

That doesn't mean everything published online is true. It certainly isn't.

But it does mean that the gatekeepers no longer control the conversation.

People who once felt isolated quickly discover they're not alone. Citizens who would have quietly accepted intimidation twenty years ago now have thousands of people willing to hear their side of the story. When someone tries to bully, marginalize, or silence another person, there's a good chance the public will find out about it.

That's a profound change in American politics.

Here in Pinellas County, I've also seen another encouraging trend.

One member of our School Board and I disagree on almost every political issue imaginable. She's unquestionably one of the more liberal members of the board.

I'd still rank her among the best members serving today.

Why?

Because I believe she's honest. I believe she's transparent. Most importantly, I believe she genuinely votes the way she thinks is best for children. I don't have to agree with her philosophy to respect the way she conducts herself.

The County Commission offers another example. There's one commissioner whose politics are about as far from mine as you can get. I disagree with nearly every policy position she takes.

But I've never known her to make politics personal.

She argues her case respectfully. She advocates for the people who elected her. She openly talks about her Christian faith. I think she's wrong on most issues, but I don't question her sincerity or her character.

Frankly, I'd rather have an honest liberal than a dishonest conservative. - David Happe

Unfortunately, not everyone shares that view.

I've watched conservatives in my own community conclude that agreement isn't enough. You're expected to demonstrate loyalty to certain personalities and certain political circles. If you don't, you're treated as though you've committed some unforgivable offense. I've even watched public officials align with some of the most radical voices on the left in attempts to attack fellow conservatives personally.

That's the old model.

It depends on fear.

It depends on convincing people they'll pay a price for speaking up.

It depends on everyone believing the people in charge are more powerful than they really are.

That illusion becomes harder to maintain every year.

Every public records request, every livestream, every independent publication, every citizen journalist, every Facebook group, every X account pulling back the curtain chips away at a system that relied on operating in the shadows.

That's why I believe the politics of personal destruction is beginning to lose.

Not because human nature has changed.

Because transparency has.

Most Americans never wanted politics to work this way. They simply weren't aware of what was happening behind the scenes. The more people see it, the less willing they are to tolerate it.

Justice Louis Brandeis said that sunlight is the best disinfectant.

He was right then.

He's even more right today.

For updates, subscribe to our free newsletter!